Not all medical education companies are created equally. When you choose a physician, you generally look for one that is not only on the leading edge of technology, but also one that is abreast of treatment guidelines and surpasses the usual standard of care. Peer·Point through Qicme, maintains this same philosophy, by placing the criteria of it’s accrediting bodies and a high ethical code at the foundation of our operations.
The President and General Manager of the Peer·Point Medical Education Institute, LLC, Richard Kennison, DPM, MBA, has worked within the healthcare and pharmaceutical industries to create and implement healthcare Quality Improvement programs aimed at narrowing the gaps associated with clinical care. He is a respected consultant in bridging the gap between education and healthcare.
Arthur Spalding, MBA, joined the company as Director of Business Development. He is responsible for expanding the brand awareness of Qicme through identifying and establishing partnerships with those wishing to implement effective healthcare QI. He is a member of the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy, National Academy of Managed Care Physicians, and Georgia Bio.
Janine A. Scotti, MBA, is Director of Educational Services. She is responsible for overseeing the company’s accreditation and project management departments. Scotti received her Bachelor of Science degree from Siena College in New York and completed her MBA in marketing in 2007.
- Pioneers and industry-leaders in QI-based accredited education
- Compatibility with most data-generating processes and systems
- Pressure tested concepts and a quality assurance process to ensure the greatest impact
- Places the needs of the participant first
- Places great value on strategic and educational partnerships
- High ethical standards
It’s easy for us to describe how we have/can execute high quality programming, but it is another thing for past stakeholders to say so:
- Nearly 100% of our participants would recommend Peer·Point’s CME activities to a colleague
- 97% feel that the activities sponsored by Peer·Point are independent, balanced, and free of commercial bias, 2% didn’t answer, and the other 1% feels that “all activities have a bias”.
- 75% reported to have consulted the enduring pieces before, during, or after a patient visit.
- “It's good to see from the evaluations that the programs met their objectives. I'm looking forward to working with you in the future. Even by e-mail and phone, your warmth and confidence came across and helped me do my best. Thank you!” - A recent faculty member
- “Thank you for your note and the thoughtful remembrance of my participation in the CME activity. It was a truly enjoyable experience. I hope to have the opportunity to collaborate again in the future.” - A recent faculty member
- “Your patience and professionalism was very much appreciated. Please extend my appreciation to the rest of the team- I hope to work with you again in the future.” - A past pharmaceutical grantor